A

JavaScript Frameworks Overview

javascript typescript frameworks frontend react vue svelte solid nextjs astro

JavaScript Frameworks Overview

The JavaScript ecosystem offers a vast array of frameworks and libraries for building modern web applications. From libraries like React to full-stack frameworks like Next.js and Astro, each tool has its own philosophy, strengths, and ideal use cases. This guide covers the most popular options to help you choose the right tool for your project.

Framework Deep Dives

For detailed information about specific frameworks, see:

  • React - Component-based UI library
  • Vue - Progressive framework
  • Svelte - Compiler-based framework
  • Angular - Full enterprise framework
  • Next.js - Full-stack React framework
  • Astro - Content-first framework

Understanding the Landscape

Libraries vs Frameworks

Library (e.g., React)

  • You call the library's code
  • More flexibility, less opinionated
  • You choose routing, state management, etc.

Framework (e.g., Angular, SvelteKit)

  • The framework calls your code
  • More opinionated, includes more features
  • Routing, state management often built-in

UI Frameworks vs Full-Stack Frameworks

UI Framework: Focuses on building user interfaces

  • React, Vue, Svelte, Solid

Full-Stack Framework: Includes server-side rendering, routing, data fetching

  • Next.js, Astro, SvelteKit, Remix, Nuxt

The Big Five

1. React

Type: Library (not a framework) First Released: 2013 Creator: Facebook (Meta) Philosophy: Component-based, declarative UI

Read the full React guide

Quick Overview:

function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  return (
    <div>
      <p>Count: {count}</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
        Increment
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

Strengths:

  • Largest ecosystem and community
  • Component reusability
  • React Native for mobile
  • Backed by Meta (Facebook)
  • Excellent TypeScript support

Considerations:

  • Not a full framework (need to add routing, etc.)
  • Requires more decision-making (choice paralysis)
  • Larger learning curve than some alternatives

Best For:

  • Large-scale applications
  • Teams with React experience
  • When you need maximum flexibility
  • Mobile apps (React Native)

Popular With:

  • Next.js (full-stack framework)
  • Remix (full-stack framework)
  • Gatsby (static sites)

2. Vue

Type: Progressive framework First Released: 2014 Creator: Evan You Philosophy: Approachable, versatile, performant

Read the full Vue guide

<template>
  <div>
    <p>Count: {{ count }}</p>
    <button @click="count++">Increment</button>
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue';

const count = ref(0);
</script>

<style scoped>
button {
  background: blue;
  color: white;
}
</style>

Strengths:

  • Gentler learning curve than React
  • Single-file components (HTML, JS, CSS together)
  • Excellent documentation
  • Built-in state management (Pinia/Vuex)
  • Great for gradual adoption

Considerations:

  • Smaller ecosystem than React
  • Less used in large enterprises
  • Fewer job opportunities than React

Best For:

  • Solo developers or small teams
  • Gradual adoption into existing projects
  • Rapid prototyping
  • Developers who prefer template syntax

Popular With:

  • Nuxt (full-stack framework)
  • Vite (build tool, created by Vue author)

3. Svelte

Type: Compiler (compiles to vanilla JS) First Released: 2016 Creator: Rich Harris Philosophy: No virtual DOM, compile-time optimizations

Read the full Svelte guide

<script>
  let count = 0;

  function increment() {
    count += 1;
  }
</script>

<div>
  <p>Count: {count}</p>
  <button on:click={increment}>
    Increment
  </button>
</div>

<style>
  button {
    background: blue;
    color: white;
  }
</style>

Strengths:

  • Smallest bundle sizes (no runtime)
  • Fastest performance (compile-time optimizations)
  • Extremely clean, readable syntax
  • Built-in reactivity (no useState, etc.)
  • Built-in animations and transitions

Considerations:

  • Smaller ecosystem than React/Vue
  • Fewer third-party component libraries
  • Less TypeScript support (improving)

Best For:

  • Performance-critical applications
  • Small bundle sizes matter
  • Interactive visualizations
  • Developers who want simplicity

Popular With:

  • SvelteKit (full-stack framework)
  • Vite (build tool)

4. Solid

Type: Reactive framework First Released: 2018 Creator: Ryan Carniato Philosophy: Fine-grained reactivity, React-like syntax

import { createSignal } from 'solid-js';

function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0);

  return (
    <div>
      <p>Count: {count()}</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count() + 1)}>
        Increment
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

Strengths:

  • Fastest performance (even faster than Svelte)
  • No virtual DOM overhead
  • React-like syntax (easy for React devs)
  • True reactivity
  • Small bundle size

Considerations:

  • Much smaller ecosystem
  • Fewer learning resources
  • Less mature tooling
  • Smaller community

Best For:

  • Performance-obsessed developers
  • React developers wanting better performance
  • Applications with complex reactive state

Popular With:

  • SolidStart (full-stack framework)

5. Angular

Type: Full framework First Released: 2010 (AngularJS), 2016 (Angular 2+) Creator: Google Philosophy: Opinionated, batteries-included

Read the full Angular guide

import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-counter',
  template: `
    <div>
      <p>Count: {{ count }}</p>
      <button (click)="increment()">Increment</button>
    </div>
  `
})
export class CounterComponent {
  count = 0;

  increment() {
    this.count++;
  }
}

Strengths:

  • Complete solution (routing, forms, HTTP, etc.)
  • Excellent TypeScript support (built with TS)
  • Strong opinions reduce decision fatigue
  • Enterprise-friendly
  • Backed by Google

Considerations:

  • Steeper learning curve
  • More verbose than alternatives
  • Larger bundle sizes
  • RxJS can be complex

Best For:

  • Large enterprise applications
  • Teams wanting structure
  • Long-term maintainability
  • TypeScript-first projects

Full-Stack Frameworks

Next.js (React)

Type: Full-stack React framework Creator: Vercel Philosophy: Hybrid static & server rendering

Read the full Next.js guide

// pages/users/[id].js
export default function User({ user }) {
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{user.name}</h1>
      <p>{user.email}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

// Server-side data fetching
export async function getServerSideProps({ params }) {
  const user = await fetchUser(params.id);
  return { props: { user } };
}

Features:

  • Server-side rendering (SSR)
  • Static site generation (SSG)
  • API routes
  • File-based routing
  • Image optimization
  • Built-in CSS support

Best For:

  • Production React apps
  • SEO-critical applications
  • Full-stack apps with React
  • Vercel deployment

Astro

Type: Full-stack framework (multi-framework) Creator: Fred K. Schott Philosophy: Ship less JavaScript, content-focused

Read the full Astro guide

---
// Runs on server only
const users = await fetchUsers();
---

<html>
  <body>
    <h1>Users</h1>
    {users.map(user => (
      <div class="user-card">
        <h2>{user.name}</h2>
        <p>{user.email}</p>
      </div>
    ))}
  </body>
</html>

<style>
  .user-card {
    border: 1px solid #ccc;
    padding: 1rem;
  }
</style>

Features:

  • Zero JavaScript by default
  • Partial hydration (island architecture)
  • Use React, Vue, Svelte together
  • Built-in optimizations
  • Content-focused

Best For:

  • Content-heavy sites (blogs, documentation)
  • Performance-first applications
  • Static sites with interactive islands
  • Multi-framework projects

Remix (React)

Type: Full-stack React framework Creator: Remix Software Philosophy: Web fundamentals, progressive enhancement

// routes/users/$id.jsx
export async function loader({ params }) {
  return json(await fetchUser(params.id));
}

export default function User() {
  const user = useLoaderData();

  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{user.name}</h1>
      <p>{user.email}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

Features:

  • Nested routing
  • Progressive enhancement
  • Optimistic UI
  • Error boundaries
  • Server-side rendering

Best For:

  • Apps prioritizing user experience
  • Complex routing requirements
  • Progressive web apps
  • Teams valuing web standards

SvelteKit (Svelte)

Type: Full-stack Svelte framework Creator: Svelte team Philosophy: Svelte for full-stack apps

<script context="module">
  // Runs on server
  export async function load({ params }) {
    const user = await fetchUser(params.id);
    return { props: { user } };
  }
</script>

<script>
  export let user;
</script>

<h1>{user.name}</h1>
<p>{user.email}</p>

Features:

  • File-based routing
  • Server-side rendering
  • Static site generation
  • API routes
  • Built on Vite

Best For:

  • Svelte developers wanting full-stack
  • Performance-critical apps
  • Smaller bundle sizes

Nuxt (Vue)

Type: Full-stack Vue framework Creator: Nuxt team Philosophy: Vue for full-stack apps

<template>
  <div>
    <h1>{{ user.name }}</h1>
    <p>{{ user.email }}</p>
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
const route = useRoute();
const { data: user } = await useFetch(`/api/users/${route.params.id}`);
</script>

Features:

  • Server-side rendering
  • Static site generation
  • File-based routing
  • Auto-imports
  • Module ecosystem

Best For:

  • Vue developers wanting full-stack
  • SEO-critical Vue apps
  • Universal Vue applications

Performance Comparison

Bundle Size (Production)

Framework Min Size Typical App
Svelte ~2 KB 5-15 KB
Solid ~7 KB 10-20 KB
Vue ~40 KB 50-100 KB
React ~45 KB 100-200 KB
Angular ~90 KB 200-500 KB

Sizes include framework runtime + minimal app code

Rendering Speed

From fastest to slowest (benchmarks vary):

  1. Solid - Fine-grained reactivity, no virtual DOM
  2. Svelte - Compiled, no runtime overhead
  3. Vue - Optimized virtual DOM
  4. React - Virtual DOM with optimizations
  5. Angular - Full framework overhead

Choosing a Framework

Decision Flowchart

Need maximum performance & small bundles? → Svelte or Solid

Building a large team-based app? → React (ecosystem) or Angular (structure)

Want gentle learning curve? → Vue or Svelte

Content-heavy site (blog, docs)? → Astro, Next.js, or Nuxt

Already know React? → Stick with React or try Solid

Enterprise app with structure? → Angular

Full-stack with React? → Next.js or Remix

Maximum flexibility? → React

By Use Case

Blog / Documentation:

  • Astro (best performance)
  • Next.js (if React is required)
  • Nuxt (if Vue is preferred)

E-commerce:

  • Next.js (great for SEO + dynamic)
  • Remix (progressive enhancement)
  • Nuxt

Admin Dashboard:

  • React (flexibility)
  • Vue (simplicity)
  • Angular (structure)

Marketing Site:

  • Astro (minimal JS)
  • Svelte (small bundle)
  • Vue

Mobile App:

  • React Native (from React)
  • Ionic (with any framework)
  • Capacitor (wrap any app)

Learning Path

Start with Vanilla JavaScript

Understand the fundamentals before frameworks:

  • DOM manipulation
  • Events
  • Fetch API
  • ES6+ features

Then Choose Your Path

Path 1: Maximum Job Opportunities

  1. React fundamentals
  2. Next.js for full-stack
  3. TypeScript
  4. React ecosystem (React Query, etc.)

Path 2: Best Learning Experience

  1. Vue fundamentals
  2. Nuxt for full-stack
  3. TypeScript
  4. Pinia (state management)

Path 3: Performance First

  1. Svelte fundamentals
  2. SvelteKit for full-stack
  3. Performance optimization

Path 4: Unique Approach

  1. Solid fundamentals
  2. SolidStart for full-stack
  3. Fine-grained reactivity patterns

The Ecosystem

State Management

React:

  • Redux (traditional)
  • Zustand (minimal)
  • Jotai (atomic)
  • TanStack Query (server state)

Vue:

  • Pinia (official)
  • Vuex (legacy)

Svelte:

  • Built-in stores
  • Svelte/store

Angular:

  • RxJS (reactive)
  • NgRx (Redux-like)

Styling

See CSS Frameworks History for more details:

Build Tools

  • Vite - Fast, modern bundler (default for most frameworks)
  • Webpack - Mature, configurable (used by older projects)
  • esbuild - Extremely fast (used internally by Vite)
  • Turbopack - Next.js's new bundler (Rust-based)
  1. Server Components - React Server Components, Astro islands
  2. Partial Hydration - Only hydrate interactive parts
  3. Full-stack frameworks - Next.js, Remix, SvelteKit, Nuxt
  4. TypeScript everywhere - Most frameworks now TypeScript-first
  5. Smaller bundles - Focus on performance

Rising Stars

  • Astro - Growing fast for content sites
  • Solid - Performance-focused developers
  • Qwik - Resumability instead of hydration
  • htmx - Minimalist, server-driven approach

Key Takeaways

  • React dominates with the largest ecosystem
  • Vue offers the gentlest learning curve
  • Svelte provides the best performance & smallest bundles
  • Solid has the fastest rendering with React-like syntax
  • Angular remains strong in enterprise
  • Full-stack frameworks (Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit) are becoming standard
  • Astro is excellent for content-heavy sites
  • Choose based on your use case, not just popularity

The JavaScript framework landscape is diverse and constantly evolving. While React remains the most popular choice, alternatives like Vue, Svelte, and Solid offer compelling benefits. Full-stack frameworks like Next.js and Astro are becoming the default for production applications. Choose the tool that fits your project requirements, team expertise, and performance needs.

Last updated: October 16, 2025